<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Must Read &#8211; Park v Alameda Superior Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/</link>
	<description>Keep Carnegie SVRA open!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:25:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Discher</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Discher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Jon, there&#039;s an area on the top right hand corner of the page titled &quot;what YOU can do&quot;. The first two, The AMA and the BRC, are organizations that are constantly fighting for our rights, with the BRC being focused on our rights with regards to trails. Like Diana was saying, the BRC is not strictly about motorcyclists, but everyone that enjoys using trails, from OHV to Equestrians and mountain bikers. What gives these organizations power is the number of people that belong to them, so every single person that signs up helps. They are our voice when it come to dealing with the government, and as George Washington said  &quot;If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.&quot; We ARE NOT sheep! In return for the small fee to join, they not only provide a voice for us but also act as eyes and ears to upcoming issues.
Now beyond joining these groups, what we can do is stay vigilant. Keep checking this page and the Facebook page for upcoming events in support of Carnegie. And don&#039;t forget about the other issues out there either. Clear Creek is under attack right now also, and the rumor mill has it that Hollister is next in line. I recently went to the BLM&#039;s meeting for Clear creek and I have to say I had a real good time. It was like hanging out with friends I haven&#039;t met before. Everyone there was very grateful to have the support of fellow riders even if we had never ridden &quot;their&quot; area before. This is where our UNITY really shines. It does take a lot of time to keep up with everything that&#039;s going on, but it is so important that we give all we can. United we ride, divided we walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, there&#8217;s an area on the top right hand corner of the page titled &#8220;what YOU can do&#8221;. The first two, The AMA and the BRC, are organizations that are constantly fighting for our rights, with the BRC being focused on our rights with regards to trails. Like Diana was saying, the BRC is not strictly about motorcyclists, but everyone that enjoys using trails, from OHV to Equestrians and mountain bikers. What gives these organizations power is the number of people that belong to them, so every single person that signs up helps. They are our voice when it come to dealing with the government, and as George Washington said  &#8220;If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.&#8221; We ARE NOT sheep! In return for the small fee to join, they not only provide a voice for us but also act as eyes and ears to upcoming issues.<br />
Now beyond joining these groups, what we can do is stay vigilant. Keep checking this page and the Facebook page for upcoming events in support of Carnegie. And don&#8217;t forget about the other issues out there either. Clear Creek is under attack right now also, and the rumor mill has it that Hollister is next in line. I recently went to the BLM&#8217;s meeting for Clear creek and I have to say I had a real good time. It was like hanging out with friends I haven&#8217;t met before. Everyone there was very grateful to have the support of fellow riders even if we had never ridden &#8220;their&#8221; area before. This is where our UNITY really shines. It does take a lot of time to keep up with everything that&#8217;s going on, but it is so important that we give all we can. United we ride, divided we walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Tweedy</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Tweedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-87</guid>
		<description>What can we do to save Carnegie? Wow you got me there. I was having existential diarrhea of the mouth (my term not his) when Jason told me that I wasn’t alone. He said that we have to stick together. He is so right. Alone we feel powerless and disenfranchised. “It takes a village” Sounds more like something Hillary Clinton would say rather than Jason. Marines don’t talk like. The truth is that according to reliable estimates 23% of Americans ride off road vehicles. We are no longer the small minority that can get slapped around. (Tyranny of the majority) This is good news, but we have to stick together. I mean all of us. Each of us no matter what out preferred method of recreation; whether it is horseback, four wheels, mountain bikes, two wheels, etc. We all have common ground now. 

I hate that holier than thou attitude that some people have toward others. “They only ride four wheels because they can’t ride on two”. Wrong and no less wrong than some mountain bikers that think that they have a softer footprint than motor vehicles and refuse to align their interests with ours. It doesn’t work. We are all in this together and instead of fighting over the spoils we need to fight together to protect our rights we will loose them forever. 

Hoofs, knobbies, or Velcro soles do not cause erosion, but rather the majority of all erosion is caused by water running down a trail that is devoid of vegetation. Yes game trails cause erosion. Erosion is perfectly natural. The difference is that human trails are maintained using heavy equipment. They just level the trails and push the loose soil into the depressions, ready to get washed away next time it rains. Maintained trails are not less prone to erosion and in fact the opposite is true. Always question what you know is true. But nobody does that and these myths just get universally believed and accepted by everyone. The fact is nobody really cares because they look better. Why does everybody want our off road riding area to look like a golf course, so manicured that you could drive a golf cart through it?

Like so many others I kept putting off joining Blue Ribbon Coalition until Carnegie was threatened. This is the big wake up call. We have to work together and share our insights towards a common goal, preserving  the sports we love. We can’t let the greedy fat cats take it away from us. Carnegie is ours and it is worth fighting for. Like George Horne said at the rally to save Carnegie, “They drew the first blood” and as Don Amador said, “they have awakened the sleeping beast”. Most of us were going about our business doing what we love to do and not giving much thought to the fact that Carnegie was getting more and more crowded because other riding areas were getting shut down.

I don’t know how we can save Carnegie, but I do know that together we can make a difference. We need to speak out and listen to each other. Here I go again. I have no real answer to your question, but I know that together we can make it happen. There are heroes like the members of CORE (Carnegie off Road Enthusiasts) who have been working for years to make Carnegie better. They are the ones who might be able to answer your question. They and all the other groups that are working to preserve our right to the enjoyment our sport and our connection with nature. Our children depend on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can we do to save Carnegie? Wow you got me there. I was having existential diarrhea of the mouth (my term not his) when Jason told me that I wasn’t alone. He said that we have to stick together. He is so right. Alone we feel powerless and disenfranchised. “It takes a village” Sounds more like something Hillary Clinton would say rather than Jason. Marines don’t talk like. The truth is that according to reliable estimates 23% of Americans ride off road vehicles. We are no longer the small minority that can get slapped around. (Tyranny of the majority) This is good news, but we have to stick together. I mean all of us. Each of us no matter what out preferred method of recreation; whether it is horseback, four wheels, mountain bikes, two wheels, etc. We all have common ground now. </p>
<p>I hate that holier than thou attitude that some people have toward others. “They only ride four wheels because they can’t ride on two”. Wrong and no less wrong than some mountain bikers that think that they have a softer footprint than motor vehicles and refuse to align their interests with ours. It doesn’t work. We are all in this together and instead of fighting over the spoils we need to fight together to protect our rights we will loose them forever. </p>
<p>Hoofs, knobbies, or Velcro soles do not cause erosion, but rather the majority of all erosion is caused by water running down a trail that is devoid of vegetation. Yes game trails cause erosion. Erosion is perfectly natural. The difference is that human trails are maintained using heavy equipment. They just level the trails and push the loose soil into the depressions, ready to get washed away next time it rains. Maintained trails are not less prone to erosion and in fact the opposite is true. Always question what you know is true. But nobody does that and these myths just get universally believed and accepted by everyone. The fact is nobody really cares because they look better. Why does everybody want our off road riding area to look like a golf course, so manicured that you could drive a golf cart through it?</p>
<p>Like so many others I kept putting off joining Blue Ribbon Coalition until Carnegie was threatened. This is the big wake up call. We have to work together and share our insights towards a common goal, preserving  the sports we love. We can’t let the greedy fat cats take it away from us. Carnegie is ours and it is worth fighting for. Like George Horne said at the rally to save Carnegie, “They drew the first blood” and as Don Amador said, “they have awakened the sleeping beast”. Most of us were going about our business doing what we love to do and not giving much thought to the fact that Carnegie was getting more and more crowded because other riding areas were getting shut down.</p>
<p>I don’t know how we can save Carnegie, but I do know that together we can make a difference. We need to speak out and listen to each other. Here I go again. I have no real answer to your question, but I know that together we can make it happen. There are heroes like the members of CORE (Carnegie off Road Enthusiasts) who have been working for years to make Carnegie better. They are the ones who might be able to answer your question. They and all the other groups that are working to preserve our right to the enjoyment our sport and our connection with nature. Our children depend on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon A</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>jon A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Diana,
What can I do to save Carnegie? I signed the petition but clearly it&#039;s not enough to save something very dear to my family and friends for many years. Thank you for your afforts at explaining the legalise for us laymen. Even I understood most of what you wrote and I only graduated from high school twenty six(26) years ago. I had turned a blind eye too late in the game but have seen the light now that you&#039;ve &quot;screwed in the light bulb&quot; for me. If you, or anyone else for that matter have any ideas, please post them for me. The wool has been pulled over the sheep&#039;s eyes for too long, let&#039;s trim it up for a real change. I&#039;ve rode those hills year round for many years and KNOW that Carnegie riders haven&#039;t done any more damage than anything else going on in that historical canyon. All I need is a push in the right direction with the simplest of tools and I can get the job done without embarassment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diana,<br />
What can I do to save Carnegie? I signed the petition but clearly it&#8217;s not enough to save something very dear to my family and friends for many years. Thank you for your afforts at explaining the legalise for us laymen. Even I understood most of what you wrote and I only graduated from high school twenty six(26) years ago. I had turned a blind eye too late in the game but have seen the light now that you&#8217;ve &#8220;screwed in the light bulb&#8221; for me. If you, or anyone else for that matter have any ideas, please post them for me. The wool has been pulled over the sheep&#8217;s eyes for too long, let&#8217;s trim it up for a real change. I&#8217;ve rode those hills year round for many years and KNOW that Carnegie riders haven&#8217;t done any more damage than anything else going on in that historical canyon. All I need is a push in the right direction with the simplest of tools and I can get the job done without embarassment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Discher</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Discher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-55</guid>
		<description>OK Diana, here is the real reason our fight will never end.
http://naturalresourcereport.com/2009/11/taxpayers-foot-the-bill-for-environmental-lawsuits/
It&#039;s been said before, follow the money. Until we can put a stop to our own government bankrolling the so called environmentalists, the fight will not end till there is nothing left to fight for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Diana, here is the real reason our fight will never end.<br />
<a href="http://naturalresourcereport.com/2009/11/taxpayers-foot-the-bill-for-environmental-lawsuits/" rel="nofollow">http://naturalresourcereport.com/2009/11/taxpayers-foot-the-bill-for-environmental-lawsuits/</a><br />
It&#8217;s been said before, follow the money. Until we can put a stop to our own government bankrolling the so called environmentalists, the fight will not end till there is nothing left to fight for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Tweedy</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Tweedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Right on Jason. The greenies don&#039;t support environmental safeguards that impact their sport. Can you say Hypocrites? Write to your congressman encouraging them to adopt these environmental laws.  Sorry fishermen. I know that you don&#039;t all belong to the Sport Fisherman&#039;s Association, but by being silent you are supporting them and we will fight back any way that we can. There is no evidence that riding at Carnegie impacts fish habitat in the San Joachuin River and Delta, so back at you fools. 
I have nothing against fish, but the Sport Fisherman&#039;s Association and Jennings have used the same dirty, backhanded tactics that they are using at Carnegie to prevent water from going to the Central Valley farmers. They bypass government agencies who have been actively working on a solution and filed actions in State court. With the help of this activist judge, they have imposed their agenda on the rest of the us. &quot;Our way or the highway&quot;, is their motto.  All the dispossessed interests need to unite together and fight this group on all fronts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Jason. The greenies don&#8217;t support environmental safeguards that impact their sport. Can you say Hypocrites? Write to your congressman encouraging them to adopt these environmental laws.  Sorry fishermen. I know that you don&#8217;t all belong to the Sport Fisherman&#8217;s Association, but by being silent you are supporting them and we will fight back any way that we can. There is no evidence that riding at Carnegie impacts fish habitat in the San Joachuin River and Delta, so back at you fools.<br />
I have nothing against fish, but the Sport Fisherman&#8217;s Association and Jennings have used the same dirty, backhanded tactics that they are using at Carnegie to prevent water from going to the Central Valley farmers. They bypass government agencies who have been actively working on a solution and filed actions in State court. With the help of this activist judge, they have imposed their agenda on the rest of the us. &#8220;Our way or the highway&#8221;, is their motto.  All the dispossessed interests need to unite together and fight this group on all fronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Discher</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Discher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Good news concerning the Smelt right here.
http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/05/12/12greenwire-calif-water-agency-changes-course-on-delta-sme-10572.html

And here&#039;s one on the sport fisherman getting bit by the greenies too.
http://capwiz.com/asafish/issues/alert/?alertid=14446771</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news concerning the Smelt right here.<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/05/12/12greenwire-calif-water-agency-changes-course-on-delta-sme-10572.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/05/12/12greenwire-calif-water-agency-changes-course-on-delta-sme-10572.html</a></p>
<p>And here&#8217;s one on the sport fisherman getting bit by the greenies too.<br />
<a href="http://capwiz.com/asafish/issues/alert/?alertid=14446771" rel="nofollow">http://capwiz.com/asafish/issues/alert/?alertid=14446771</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Tweedy</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Tweedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jason. You really understand and your solution is right on.  We have to band together. Here are some paragraphs taken from 

http://www.libertymatters.org/newsservice/2007/faxback/3123_Pumps.htm

It&#039;s the same people, Jennings and Roesch.  Maybe the tide is turning. They never give up. The fight is to the death.

Judge Orders State to Shut Down Pumps to Save Delta Smelt, Salmon
Dan Bacher 
Thursday Apr 5th, 2007 5:54 PM

Alameda Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch ruled that the California Department of Water Resources must obtain a &quot;take permit&quot; from the Department of Fish and Game for any endangered Delta smelt, spring run chinook salmon and winter run chinook salmon that it kills in the water export pumps of the California Delta. In a monumental victory for anglers and conservationists, a judge on March 22 ordered the State Department of Water Resources to shut down the state&#039;s water export pumps in the South Delta in order to save endangered salmon and Delta smelt. 

Alameda Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch, in a strongly worded opinion, ordered the State Resources Agency to “cease and desist” from further operation of the Delta pumps “until and unless” they obtain from the DFG an incidental take permit for winter run chinook salmon, spring run chinook salmon, and Delta smelt in compliance with the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).

“We&#039;re delighted and surprised with the decision,” said Bill Jennings, executive director of Watershed Protectors, a project of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance. (CSPA) “The judge agreed with us that the Fish and Game Code clearly states that you have to get a permit if you&#039;re going to kill endangered species in the Delta pumps.”

Officials with the Department of Water Resources were very upset with the ruling - and concerned that the judge hadn&#039;t considered the Bay Delta Habitat Conservation Plan (BDHCP) now being developed in collaboration with an array of state agencies. 

“We&#039;re perplexed with the court&#039;s ruling in this case,” said Lester Snow, director of DWR. “We find the prospect of curtailing pumping to be unacceptable in terms of the economic consequences to the state.” 

“We are committed to developing a cutting edge conservation package for the Delta, and have been for some time. We&#039;re also working with federal agencies on development of a new biological opinion. We certainly will suggest that the judge reconsider his draft decision and put it in terms that are more logical and acceptable to developing a conservation program for the Delta,&quot; he explained. 

“DFG and DWR have engaged in a dance of denial in avoiding the CESA,” said Jennings, “since they aren&#039;t prepared to mitigate for the loss of species listed under CESA.” 

Michael Lozeau, the attorney representing the alliance, emphasized that the agency will have to mitigate fish losses by reducing pumping, improving habitat and other measures. “They have to replace every single Delta smelt, winter run chinook or spring run chinook that is taken in the Delta pumping facilities,” Lozeau said.

“The question we must ask ourselves is whether or not our fisheries can survive the DFG remaining within the Resources Agency,” added Jennings. “

For more information, contact: Bill Jennings, Chairman, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance Watershed Enforcers

That is how it ends. The same Bill Jennings as is involved in shutting down Carnegie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jason. You really understand and your solution is right on.  We have to band together. Here are some paragraphs taken from </p>
<p><a href="http://www.libertymatters.org/newsservice/2007/faxback/3123_Pumps.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.libertymatters.org/newsservice/2007/faxback/3123_Pumps.htm</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same people, Jennings and Roesch.  Maybe the tide is turning. They never give up. The fight is to the death.</p>
<p>Judge Orders State to Shut Down Pumps to Save Delta Smelt, Salmon<br />
Dan Bacher<br />
Thursday Apr 5th, 2007 5:54 PM</p>
<p>Alameda Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch ruled that the California Department of Water Resources must obtain a &#8220;take permit&#8221; from the Department of Fish and Game for any endangered Delta smelt, spring run chinook salmon and winter run chinook salmon that it kills in the water export pumps of the California Delta. In a monumental victory for anglers and conservationists, a judge on March 22 ordered the State Department of Water Resources to shut down the state&#8217;s water export pumps in the South Delta in order to save endangered salmon and Delta smelt. </p>
<p>Alameda Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch, in a strongly worded opinion, ordered the State Resources Agency to “cease and desist” from further operation of the Delta pumps “until and unless” they obtain from the DFG an incidental take permit for winter run chinook salmon, spring run chinook salmon, and Delta smelt in compliance with the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).</p>
<p>“We&#8217;re delighted and surprised with the decision,” said Bill Jennings, executive director of Watershed Protectors, a project of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance. (CSPA) “The judge agreed with us that the Fish and Game Code clearly states that you have to get a permit if you&#8217;re going to kill endangered species in the Delta pumps.”</p>
<p>Officials with the Department of Water Resources were very upset with the ruling &#8211; and concerned that the judge hadn&#8217;t considered the Bay Delta Habitat Conservation Plan (BDHCP) now being developed in collaboration with an array of state agencies. </p>
<p>“We&#8217;re perplexed with the court&#8217;s ruling in this case,” said Lester Snow, director of DWR. “We find the prospect of curtailing pumping to be unacceptable in terms of the economic consequences to the state.” </p>
<p>“We are committed to developing a cutting edge conservation package for the Delta, and have been for some time. We&#8217;re also working with federal agencies on development of a new biological opinion. We certainly will suggest that the judge reconsider his draft decision and put it in terms that are more logical and acceptable to developing a conservation program for the Delta,&#8221; he explained. </p>
<p>“DFG and DWR have engaged in a dance of denial in avoiding the CESA,” said Jennings, “since they aren&#8217;t prepared to mitigate for the loss of species listed under CESA.” </p>
<p>Michael Lozeau, the attorney representing the alliance, emphasized that the agency will have to mitigate fish losses by reducing pumping, improving habitat and other measures. “They have to replace every single Delta smelt, winter run chinook or spring run chinook that is taken in the Delta pumping facilities,” Lozeau said.</p>
<p>“The question we must ask ourselves is whether or not our fisheries can survive the DFG remaining within the Resources Agency,” added Jennings. “</p>
<p>For more information, contact: Bill Jennings, Chairman, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance Watershed Enforcers</p>
<p>That is how it ends. The same Bill Jennings as is involved in shutting down Carnegie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Discher</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Discher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-43</guid>
		<description>So much for being &quot;retired&quot; Diana! LOL I can appreciate how being a lawyer could frustrate you. I&#039;ve only just begun to get involved in these issues and I am already feeling frustrated. Since going to the meeting for CCMA it has only gotten worse. On the positive side, the people I have met have been wonderful and have kept me from getting overwhelmed. I still feel that as long as we stick together, we can make the courts/politicians see the light. We are very lucky to have people like you, Dave, Gunnar and others on our side. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for being &#8220;retired&#8221; Diana! LOL I can appreciate how being a lawyer could frustrate you. I&#8217;ve only just begun to get involved in these issues and I am already feeling frustrated. Since going to the meeting for CCMA it has only gotten worse. On the positive side, the people I have met have been wonderful and have kept me from getting overwhelmed. I still feel that as long as we stick together, we can make the courts/politicians see the light. We are very lucky to have people like you, Dave, Gunnar and others on our side. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Tweedy</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Tweedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-42</guid>
		<description>THE GOOD THE BAD AND THE UGLY

(1)  Lead ban confounds industry 3/16/2009

A recent action by the Obama administration has left anglers and the fishing industry scratching their heads. Last week, the National Park Service (NPS) suddenly announced it would ban lead fishing tackle in national parks by 2010.

The American Sportfishing Association (ASA) weighed on in the controversy with a widely distributed statement. &quot;The sportfishing industry is surprised and dismayed by the March 10 announcement made by the National Park Service,&quot; said ASA VP Gordon Robertson. &quot;Their intention to eliminate the use of lead in fishing tackle in national parks was made without prior consultation of the sportfishing industry or the millions of recreational anglers who fish within the national park system.&quot; 

My comment is stick it to them.

http://www.texaswildlifeunlimited.com/texas_outdoor_partners/2009/03/here-is-a-disturbing-piece-

 (2)  Calif. water agency changes course on delta smelt

Lester Snow, director of the California Department of Water Resources, is questioning whether increasing freshwater flows in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to protect the tiny fish is worth the effort -- a reversal of the department&#039;s position.

Citing &quot;new information,&quot; Snow told the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that a federal biological opinion in place since December may be overstating threats to the smelt. The opinion ordered pumping restrictions throughout California&#039;s State Water Project in wet years to ensure water flows for the smelt during the fall spawning season.

Unpublished research conducted by Snow&#039;s department, in concert with the California Department of Fish and Game, has revealed the existence of a separate delta smelt population in an area that is not affected by state water operations, Snow said. The population in question is thriving in a tidal marsh around Liberty Island in the northern delta.

&quot;This population suggests that delta smelt are less susceptible to a catastrophic event than previously thought,&quot; Snow wrote in the letter to Ren Lohoefener, FWS&#039;s regional director in Sacramento.

Snow urged FWS to revisit water-storage restrictions at Oroville Dam, a crucial source of water, especially to farmers in the fertile San Joaquin Valley. The biological opinion in question would make the DWR release cold water in wet years to aid the smelt as it spawns.

Environmentalists were enraged at the apparent about-face and criticized Snow for what they see as political expedience.  

Are these the same smelt that Judge Roesch used as rational to shut off the water to Central Valley farmers? My comment is more of the same... Ha Ha

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/05/12/12greenwire-calif-water-agency-changes-course-on-delta-s

(3)  Bicycles tear up the west Hills

Check this out. We are not allowed to ride the West Hills in the rain, but it seems that the rangers think that it is OK for non-green-sticker bicycles to do so. Check out the damage. I am a bicyclist but this is outrageous. (I won the woman&#039;s  pro downhill California national race in 1988) 

http://www.videosurf.com/video/groovy-gravity-games-2005-downhill-mountain-bike-race-53651225?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE GOOD THE BAD AND THE UGLY</p>
<p>(1)  Lead ban confounds industry 3/16/2009</p>
<p>A recent action by the Obama administration has left anglers and the fishing industry scratching their heads. Last week, the National Park Service (NPS) suddenly announced it would ban lead fishing tackle in national parks by 2010.</p>
<p>The American Sportfishing Association (ASA) weighed on in the controversy with a widely distributed statement. &#8220;The sportfishing industry is surprised and dismayed by the March 10 announcement made by the National Park Service,&#8221; said ASA VP Gordon Robertson. &#8220;Their intention to eliminate the use of lead in fishing tackle in national parks was made without prior consultation of the sportfishing industry or the millions of recreational anglers who fish within the national park system.&#8221; </p>
<p>My comment is stick it to them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.texaswildlifeunlimited.com/texas_outdoor_partners/2009/03/here-is-a-disturbing-piece-" rel="nofollow">http://www.texaswildlifeunlimited.com/texas_outdoor_partners/2009/03/here-is-a-disturbing-piece-</a></p>
<p> (2)  Calif. water agency changes course on delta smelt</p>
<p>Lester Snow, director of the California Department of Water Resources, is questioning whether increasing freshwater flows in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to protect the tiny fish is worth the effort &#8212; a reversal of the department&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>Citing &#8220;new information,&#8221; Snow told the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that a federal biological opinion in place since December may be overstating threats to the smelt. The opinion ordered pumping restrictions throughout California&#8217;s State Water Project in wet years to ensure water flows for the smelt during the fall spawning season.</p>
<p>Unpublished research conducted by Snow&#8217;s department, in concert with the California Department of Fish and Game, has revealed the existence of a separate delta smelt population in an area that is not affected by state water operations, Snow said. The population in question is thriving in a tidal marsh around Liberty Island in the northern delta.</p>
<p>&#8220;This population suggests that delta smelt are less susceptible to a catastrophic event than previously thought,&#8221; Snow wrote in the letter to Ren Lohoefener, FWS&#8217;s regional director in Sacramento.</p>
<p>Snow urged FWS to revisit water-storage restrictions at Oroville Dam, a crucial source of water, especially to farmers in the fertile San Joaquin Valley. The biological opinion in question would make the DWR release cold water in wet years to aid the smelt as it spawns.</p>
<p>Environmentalists were enraged at the apparent about-face and criticized Snow for what they see as political expedience.  </p>
<p>Are these the same smelt that Judge Roesch used as rational to shut off the water to Central Valley farmers? My comment is more of the same&#8230; Ha Ha</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/05/12/12greenwire-calif-water-agency-changes-course-on-delta-s" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/05/12/12greenwire-calif-water-agency-changes-course-on-delta-s</a></p>
<p>(3)  Bicycles tear up the west Hills</p>
<p>Check this out. We are not allowed to ride the West Hills in the rain, but it seems that the rangers think that it is OK for non-green-sticker bicycles to do so. Check out the damage. I am a bicyclist but this is outrageous. (I won the woman&#8217;s  pro downhill California national race in 1988) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.videosurf.com/video/groovy-gravity-games-2005-downhill-mountain-bike-race-53651225?" rel="nofollow">http://www.videosurf.com/video/groovy-gravity-games-2005-downhill-mountain-bike-race-53651225?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://carnegieforever.org/2010/01/22/must-read-park-v-alameda-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnegieforever.org/?p=227#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Sorry, we don&#039;t have anything new yet. Hoping for good news ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, we don&#8217;t have anything new yet. Hoping for good news &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.098 seconds -->
